Common matter series


Artist
: Neil Hoffmann

Year : –

Size : –

Media : Wood Fired Stone

connection between this artwork and my practice:

Hoffmann’s work is process-based. He follows the idea of materials creating the form during the firing process. He tries to minimise artist’s conscious decision making and let the material get the form. He places materials such as glaze, clay and stone next to each other. He lets materials react to each other during firing and become one Anti-form that has its own character, rather than the artist forming them.

The firing process plays the most important part in his sculptures. He uses local stones and places them in the kiln. During the multiple firings, stones lose the solid form and become a formless sculpture.

The most important thing that attracts me to his works, is how he uses traditional techniques and moves away from representationality of ceramic objects. How material and making process play and control and the artist absorbs and guid the form instead of limiting the artwork.

Being conscious that we can’t control everything is coming out of his conscious choice of natural material and uncontrolled process such as wood fire for a main making step.

WEATHERING & VISUAL COMPLEXITY

Artist : Sandy Lockwood

Year : –

Size : –

Media : Wood fired ceramic

connection between this artwork and my practice:

sandy says “My way of making and firing allows for each piece to tell the story of its becoming ” (Sandy lockwood)

Lockwood is the artist that is conscious about her surroundings, in her speech, during ceramic triennial, she talked about how she pays attention to texture, objects in everyday life and how she cares about materiality of the objects.

It is interesting to see a ceramist who cares about materiality of ceramics instead of ceramic as a functional or representational object.

It is important to mention she has a strong relationship with making process and material she uses. She collects specific type of dust or stone and mixes and makes her own materials. In her work it’s so clear that material qualities and making process steps play an important role.

In Her speech she mentioned the term “Meshwork” from Tim Ingold’s books.

Ingold says: ” I have borrowed the term ‘meshwork’ from the philosophy of Henri Lefebvre.” (Bringing Things to Life: Creative Entanglements in a World of Materials- Page 12)

Meshwork as something that we all weave in our work from our life experience. Ingold says: “When I speak of the entanglement of things I mean this literally and precisely: not a network of connections but a meshwork of interwoven lines of growth and movement” (Bringing Things to Life: Creative Entanglements in a World of Materials- Page 4)

I think what makes an artwork unique and art is when artist finds his or her own meshwork that is woven to the work. And I don’t think meshwork can be a meaning or describing or categorising the artwork.